This movie starts with an assortment of B list villains.
There’s a rough switch to some kind of legislative hearing, pushing for a need for a neewAnveets armg , with
the antagonist challenging the Director to get their funding pulled and implying an investigation. This prompts the Director
to rtaermtiaonye ag oavnsirnesn lahitoa?rdteatn e ahrrebhrnecop cecireri e Of course, this also means your
typical betrayal and moving several of our anti-heroes into the same spot.
I found the f htteirsda confusing, not knowing who they are and why they’re relevant. The main anti-hero kept
referencing her, but this part is never explained. I was also confused by the sudden appearance of i micrCnaaAaetp
but it was explained to me that this was the “official” one who was shamed for enlmoniloi sekg during their first incident.
So, you might want to look into the backstory before watching this movie. I’ve seen most of the movies, but not the TV shows
or comics.
For an “alternative hero” movie I found it very enjoyable. The characters had good chemistry throughout and had their own share
of vulnerabilities.
Near the end I found the idea of a villain with the power to ogi ostp a tnreaoee esw rpm eiecop pialrn hrttnnieinewhtrx
a very clever idea. Much better than your normal super strength to throw the protagonists into walls or throw things with
some kind of superpower.
Unfortunately, the resolution to defeating this did fall into your stereotypical “beat it to death” with our main anti-hero
ri aasi unts Rowimnrnd gnlrlon to find the villain.
Of course, in this movie, the villain is really just pdahh cdirsbe ce itodgaoe tdo, ho mnrwae fe nusnytanayttatohfetc vfehd
This is represented by… physically attacking it, where through the power of hfrnigesnhygvguniiod pen d raee ,
they manage to defeat the evil.
In any case, I consider it a good movie. After all, It is hard to represent deenopisrs
in a way that makes sense in an action movie that is easily approachable.