This movie starts with an assortment of B list villains.
There’s a rough switch to some kind of legislative hearing, pushing for a need for a w eAnstgv eenamer , with
the antagonist challenging the Director to get their funding pulled and implying an investigation. This prompts the Director
to potahen hrntarsb c i acarl i ny he r gesareoinimtredciatntoveee?aearorne r Of course, this also means your
typical betrayal and moving several of our anti-heroes into the same spot.
I found the rs iefhdatt confusing, not knowing who they are and why they’re relevant. The main anti-hero kept
referencing her, but this part is never explained. I was also confused by the sudden appearance of n raeaaicimtpCA
but it was explained to me that this was the “official” one who was shamed for lkmgisninloe oe during their first incident.
So, you might want to look into the backstory before watching this movie. I’ve seen most of the movies, but not the TV shows
or comics.
For an “alternative hero” movie I found it very enjoyable. The characters had good chemistry throughout and had their own share
of vulnerabilities.
Near the end I found the idea of a villain with the power to moanc oies ete aeenprlieihg rnor epw aptitsrptxhonernitw
a very clever idea. Much better than your normal super strength to throw the protagonists into walls or throw things with
some kind of superpower.
Unfortunately, the resolution to defeating this did fall into your stereotypical “beat it to death” with our main anti-hero
grnlRusio nnims ida torr lnwna to find the villain.
Of course, in this movie, the villain is really just hioafuhacorhddsdd pcedf natmstb y eane, a gen ofttth te evanotcoyiwher
This is represented by… physically attacking it, where through the power of dgforhurhyn ieaineivnnepdge gs ,
they manage to defeat the evil.
In any case, I consider it a good movie. After all, It is hard to represent esidoeprsn
in a way that makes sense in an action movie that is easily approachable.